Improve export accessibility with more visible colors | Voters

Improve export accessibility with more visible colors

under review

Elmer Zoomer

For the colorblind people, it is hard to see the different colors between: Ageed, Difference and Small difference. It would be nice if there was a bigger difference between these colors. Like with the normal datasnipper colors.

November 17, 2021

Thomas M Galligan

If possible, our teams would like to be able to change the color presets. We generally utilize red for tickmarks becasue it stands out more. We would like to be able to use red instead of blue to indicate that workpapers were ticked and tied

R.K.J. ter Laan

For the FSS, as a suggestion, instead of using only colors, I would suggest using different symbols.
For MA tickmarks for example, use <, ^ whenever agreed, same as you already implemented in the tool.
Use the Δ symbol to highlight how much the amount is off within the tickmark for both misstatements and highlighted amounts. For example, < - Δ 1.
For IC and PY, I would suggest the same methodology for highlights and differences. Just show this IC Δ -1, or PY Δ -1.
If you could then also indicate what the correct amount should be in a comment that can be exported to our PDF, that would make a lot of difference in documentation.

Kai Bakker ⚡

R.K.J. ter Laan: If the amount is incorrect, would you also show the difference? This would mean you could see something like: Δ 12345

R.K.J. ter Laan

Kai Bakker ⚡: Yes that would be perfect.

Youssef Hounat

marked this post as

under review

Youssef Hounat

@EElmer Zoomer a really great point, thanks for flagging this to us, i think we will look into how we can apply contrasting colours to adhere to UX guidelines in this topic.